Lindsay Perigo
The Politically Incorrect Show - 06/10/1999
Music - Die Fledermaus
Good afternoon, Kaya Oraaa & welcome to the Politically Incorrect Show on the free speech network, Radio Pacific, for Wednesday October 6, proudly sponsored by Tuariki Tobacco Ltd, the show that says bugger the politicians & bureaucrats & all the other bossyboot busybodies who try to run our lives with our money; that stands tall for free enterprise, achievement, profit, & excellence, against the state-worshippers in our midst; that stands above all for the most sacred thing in the universe, the liberty of the human individual.
Music up, music down!
"How will you guarantee our individual liberties and private property rights?"
That is the topic in the ABC Abolish Bureaucratic Crimes road show debates that are causing such a stir wherever they take place. It’s a hard row to hoe for Alliance Retard & Hard Labour candidates at these encounters, since they don’t believe in individual liberty & private property rights to begin with. It’s even harder for the National Socialists, who pretend to believe in such things but have ridden roughshod over them, in large part via the Resource Management Abomination which was the legacy of Compulsion-Touters in the fourth Labour Government, meaning ACT has a hard time of it in these debates as well. Candidates from all these parties, when pinned down, if they don’t dissemble altogether, repair to "the common good" to justify their evil. The unsmiling Alliance Retard candidate did it particularly well in Wellington on Saturday night in plodding "class stroogle" accent. Now the Alliance Retard candidate who was going to be showing up for the Nelson debate on Friday 15th has pulled out. This is what she said in her e-mail to Adrian Chisholm:
"Sorry, but having considered the topic I now feel it would be inapproapriate [mis-spelled] for me to take part in the debate. We are far more interested in the collective good and I feel it would be a waste of my time."
As I’ve often said, an Alliance Socialist is morally superior in one respect to a National Socialist: she’s an honest socialist. Here she’s giving it to us straight: "We’re not interested in talking about individual liberty & private property rights; we’re far more interested in the common good. The common good as defined by us and as imposed by us." As though ANY kind of good can come from the forcible imposition of values.
Here’s another instance of it:
"All property is common property. The owner is bound by the people … to the responsible management of his goods. His legal position is only justified when he satisfies this responsibility to the community."
Preamble to the Resource Management Act? It could easily be, but it’s not. Comrade Neanderton? Could easily be, but it’s not. Simone d’Uptart, of our National Socialist government? Could easily be, but it’s not. Actually, it was a spokesman for the earlier National Socialist Party (the one in Germany), Ernst Huber, in 1933.
Or again:
"It is thus necessary that the individual should finally come to realise that his own ego is of no importance in comparison with the existence of his nation; that the position of the individual ego is conditioned solely by the interests of the nation as a whole … that above all the unity of a nation’s spirit & will are worth far more than the freedom of the spirit and the will of an individual."
That was Big Adolf himself.
I guess he wouldn’t have attended the ABC debates either!
Politically Incorrect Show, beating the bastards back - 309 3099
If you enjoyed this, why not subscribe?